Matej Dodig vs Daniel Cukierman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jun at 03:28 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dodig vs D. Cukierman

 CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 ISR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dodig 1 - 0 Cukierman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matej Dodig winning 2 and Daniel Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Matej Dodig and Daniel Cukierman was at the Bratislava 1 Challenger, 09-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Matej Dodig getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Dodig | 1 | 
| Cukierman | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Bratislava 1 Challenger(06-09-25)
M. Dodig vs D. Cukierman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $10,165 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 62.83% (120-71) | Career Total W/L | 56.11% (257-201) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 6 | Titles | 3 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) | 
M. Dodig vs D. Cukierman Match Preview:
- How does second serve efficiency impact predictions? Recently, Dodig has shown a slightly better second serve performance, winning 45.01% of these points compared to Cukierman's 41.42%.
 - Who holds an edge in return games? Cukierman's return game is notably stronger, capturing 50.61% of opponent's second serve points, while Dodig secures 47.85%.
 - What about first serve returns? Here again, Cukierman has a slight advantage with a 30.42% success rate, compared to Dodig's 28.77%.
 - Under pressure, who handles breakpoints more effectively? Dodig demonstrates superior breakpoint resilience, saving 55.05% of such points versus Cukierman's 47.57%.
 - Overall win percentage over last year? Dodig leads with a 42.86% win rate, while Cukierman trails slightly at 40.74%.
 - Which surfaces do they prefer? Cukierman's best performances come on clay (57% win rate), whereas Dodig excels on hard courts with a 68% win rate.
 - Level of play impact? Both play primarily in Challengers/ITF > $10K events, with Cukierman winning 40% and Dodig, 39.13%.
 - Analyzing opponent quality, Dodig has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 335.73 compared to Cukierman's 354.96.
 - Deciding sets performance shows Dodig winning half of them, a distinct edge over Cukierman's 38% success in such situations.
 - What about converting breakpoints? Cukierman has a slight edge here, converting 37.5% compared to Dodig's 36.36%.
 
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
Reviewing recent performance patterns, Dodig shows strength in second serve effectiveness and against marginally higher-quality opponents, which suggests valuable experience.
Cukierman, on the other hand, outperforms in return games, indicating robustness when facing an opponent's serve. However, Dodig seems slightly better under breakpoint pressure.
When matches reach a crucial final set, Dodig's success rate further illustrates his aptitude in high-stakes scenarios. However, the surface preferences could shape this match outcome, benefiting Dodig on hard courts.
Overall, weighing these factors, Dodig is slightly favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Matej Dodig vs Daniel Cukierman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Dodig vs D. Cukierman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 6 | 
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 | 
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 | 
| 1:13:15 | Average Match Time | 1:13:15 | 
| 62% (33/53) | 1st Serve % | 60% (35/58) | 
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (26/35) | 
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) | 
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) | 
| 40% (23/58) | Return Points Win % | 30% (16/53) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Dodig Recent Matches Played
D. Cukierman Recent Matches Played

M. Dodig vs D. Cukierman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.83% (120/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.11% (257/201) | 
| 59.28% (265/182) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.61% (575/459) | 
| 53.05% (2235/1978) | Games Win/Loss | 52.78% (4905/4388) | 
| 68.18% (15/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.41% (182/135) | 
| 63.01% (92/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (50/40) | 
| 56.52% (13/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (25/25) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 
| 661 | Aces Total | 733 | 
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 | 
| 551 | Total Double Faults | 1082 | 
| 1:48:7 | Average Match Time | 1:11:43 | 
| 219.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.66 | 
| 58% (7796/13375) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13860/21979) | 
| 70% (5453/7796) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9132/13860) | 
| 50% (2800/5579) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3931/8119) | 
| 41% (595/1450) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1158/2461) | 
| 41% (5372/13237) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9545/22173) | 
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 35.71% (5/9) | 
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 52.04% (51/47) | Challenger W/L | 45.63% (47/56) | 
| 76.14% (67/21) | Futures W/L | 60.29% (205/135) | 
| 62% (116/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (253/449) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 54% (28/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (43/92) | 
| 58% (39/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (62/125) | 
| 84% (119/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (254/223) | 
| 16% (119/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (254/30) | 
| 28% (72/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (203/33) |